Saturday, December 15, 2012

Why Amazon Is Borrowing $3 Billion

http://www.businessinsider.com/why-amazon-is-borrowing-3-billion-2012-11?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2Falleyinsider%2Fsilicon_alley_insider+%28Silicon+Alley+Insider%29


Amazon is seeking to raise $3 billion in debt, the Wall Street Journal reports.
And why not? It's paying 0.38 to 0.93 percentage points more than comparable Treasury rates in interest for the bonds, which mature in 3, 5, or 10 years.
As of the last quarter, Amazon had $5.25 billion in cash and short-term securities, and no long-term debt. But it has plenty of uses for that cash: First, its headquarters, which it just agreed to buy for $1.16 billion. Second, its gigantic fulfillment centers, which it is planting across the United States as the old sales-tax regime (where online retailers where exempt from collecting tax) falls apart.
In the '90s, Amazon first generated equal parts cash and controversy by venturing into the debt markets to fund its expansion. Some predicted a debt-fueled death spiral for the then-unprofitable retailer. But since then, it has seized a huge advantage over its competitors by making a bet others weren't willing to make on warehouses that speed goods to shoppers' doorsteps.
Here's the most intriguing thing Amazon could spend the money on: a same-day delivery network in major cities coast to coast.

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Seth Godin's Ideas for Revolutionizing Education

http://www.benarment.com/history_in_the_making/2012/11/seth-godins-ideas-for-revolutionizing-education.html


1. Homework during the day, lectures at night.

2. Open book, open notes, all the time. Memorization isn't needed.

3. Access to any course, anywhere in the world, anytime you want to take it.

4. Precise, focused education, rather than mass, batched stuff.

5. No more multiple choice exams.

6. Measuring experience instead of test scores.

7. Cooperation instead of isolation.

8. The teacher's role transforms into coach.

9. Lifelong learning

10. The death of the famous college

Saturday, December 8, 2012

CHART OF THE DAY: Samsung's Massive Marketing Budget Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-samsungs-massive-marketing-budget-2012-11#ixzz2EUzYRJyd

http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-samsungs-massive-marketing-budget-2012-11


Another great chart from Horace Dediu at Asymco. He looks at the advertising budget of Apple, Samsung, HP, Dell, Microsoft, and Coke. Why include Coke? Because it's a huge advertiser, and its "primary cost of sales is advertising."
As you can see, Samsung is blowing all the companies away in advertising and marketing.
Not a bad price to pay, if it means you get to become the world's biggest smartphone company. Certainly HTC wishes it had Samsung's marketing budget.


chart of the day, samsung's marketing budget in context, november 2012

Sunday, November 25, 2012

8 Behaviours that make a Great Manager at Google – and 3 that don’t!

http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20121116160801-64875646-8-behaviours-that-make-a-great-manager-at-google-and-3-that-don-t?_mSplash=1


What is it that makes a great manager? And what are behaviours that make managers struggle? These are question that many of us would like to have an answer to. Internet giant Google Inc. went on a hunt to find the answers. Based on some extensive research that involved interviews with their managers, surveys of their employees, and regression analysis of things such as job performance and employee satisfaction, Google was able to identify these eight behaviours that make a great manager in Google:
  1. Is a good coach
  2. Empowers the team and does not micromanage
  3. Expresses interest / concern for team members’ success and personal wellbeing
  4. Is productive and results-orientated
  5. Is a good communicator – listens and shares information
  6. Helps with career development
  7. Has a clear vision / strategy for the team
  8. Has important technical skills that help him / her advice the team
In addition to the eight behaviours they have identified for a good manager, they also narrowed down on the top 3 causes why managers are struggling in their role:
  1. Has a tough transition (e.g. suddenly promoted, hired from outside with little training)
  2. Lacks a consistent philosophy / approach to performance management and career development
  3. Spends too little time on managing and communicating.
Google has acted on these insights and have started to measure their managers against these behaviours through twice-yearly feedback surveys. This has allowed them to put in place early warning systems to detect both great and struggling managers. Google has also revised its management training in light of these findings.
My question to you is do you agree with these findings? Do you think the 8 qualities of a good manager in Google are also right for your organisation? Please let me know what you think.
What Google did is something that many companies are lacking, they had a management question: ‘What makes a good manager?’ and instead of just going on gut feel and anecdotal evidence, they collected data and facts to find an answer to their question. You might want to check out my book ‘The Intelligent Company’ in which I explore many other examples of how fact-based decisions drive real performance improvements.

Friday, November 23, 2012

Amazon lance son système de consignes : Amazon Locker

http://www.distripedie.com/distripedie/spip.php?article2159



"De plus en plus d’acteurs du e commerce développent des points retraits afin que les consommateurs puissent recevoir leurs commandes. Certains s’appuient sur des réseaux existants comme La Redoute et ses Relais Colis, d’autres développent leur propre réseau comme Pixmania. Aux USA, Amazon est en train de tester à grande échelle un système de consignes, installé chez le leader de la proximité « 7 Eleven ». (...)" (Extrait)

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

5 must-haves for a successful meeting

http://smartblogs.com/leadership/2012/10/26/5-must-haves-successful-meetings/


We’ve all heard the jokes — hold a meeting! You can see people, create charts, drink coffee, have doughnuts, impress your colleagues — all on company time.
Successful meetings are possible. With forethought and planning, your meetings will use attendees’ time wisely and accomplish important business goals.

Structure meetings to ensure effective results. Every meeting must have:

A written objective.
Crucial stakeholders’ attendance.
A circulated agenda.
Beginning and end times.
A written summary with action items, fixed responsibility and follow up.

Monday, November 19, 2012

Eurozone Unemployment Rates (EU = 11.6%)

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2012/11/eurozone-unemployment-rates-eu-11-6/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheBigPicture+%28The+Big+Picture%29


The Euro zone announced yesterday that unemployment was at 11.6%. Here is a breakdown by country for Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy, France, Ireland, Germany, Austria, Netherlands, Luxembourg.
Note the fearsome foursome: Spain (25%), Greece (20%), Portugal (16%), Ireland (15%):

Saturday, November 17, 2012

L'obésité des Américains équivaut à 3 milliards de litres de carburant par an

http://www.caradisiac.com/L-obesite-des-americains-equivaut-a-3-milliards-de-litre-de-carburant-par-an-78256.htm#xtor=RSS-40


Le poids est l'ennemi comme pouvait le dire Colin Chapman, et il ne croyait pas si bien dire. Une étude américaine prouve que le surpoids des Américains (comparé à celui des Américains des années soixante) fait consommer un milliard de gallons en plus par an.
En 2006, une étude américaine était lancée pour évaluer le "poids" de l'obésité dans la consommation de carburant. Les résultats étant publiés, le constat est clair : les Américains sont toujours de plus en plus gros, et la facture carburant est de plus en plus importante. Selon cette étude, si les Américains étaient de la même corpulence que la population du pays de l'oncle Sam dans les années soixante, ils consommeraient 938 millions de gallons de moins par an, soit un peu plus de 3 milliards de litres d'or noir.
On apprend également que chaque livre supplémentaire (environ 400 g) par personne fait grimper la consommation de 38 millions de gallons par an. Des chiffres qui datent déjà de six ans, et depuis, ils ont certainement du encore augmenter. Et même si ce surplus de carburant annuel n'équivaut qu'à 0,8 % de la consommation totale des Etats-Unis, la facture est tout de même lourde financièrement et écologiquement. Au final, même si les constructeurs font des efforts pour inverser la tendance et faire baisser la consommation moyenne de leurs véhicules, le poids transporté est plus important et cela annule tout. Aux Etats-Unis, le thème de la santé public est donc intimement lié à celui de l'écologie et de la flambée des prix des carburants. Un double enjeu qui ne verra son salut que par un rééquilibrage alimentaire massif de la population.

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Your Best Salesperson is Not Your Best Sales Manager

http://smallbiztrends.com/2012/03/your-best-salesperson-not-your-best-sales-manager.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+SmallBusinessTrends+%28Small+Business+Trends%29


Who’s the first person you look to when it’s time to make a promotion? If you’re going by pure logic, it’s usually the best person on the team. But that’s not always the case for your sales team. Your best sales person may even be your worst sales manager candidate.
sales manager
Sure, a good salesperson knows how to sell, but how often do managers sell? They may still hit their numbers — hey, they may even surpass them — but the rest of your sales team is left struggling to hit their full potential because they’re not being properly managed.  And if your sales team isn’t hitting their full potential, neither is your business. In fact, Cisco Systems estimated that bad bosses cost firms $12 million annually. Imagine how much you could grow your business if even just a fraction of that was filtered back into your businesses? Ready to start looking for the real candidate for your sales manager?
The characteristics of a good salesperson are money motivated, large ego, and a bit selfish,” said Greta Schulz, founder and CEO of Schulz Sales Consulting. “These are the opposite of what a sales manager should be.
So, what qualities should you look for in a sales manager? Glad you asked. Schulz suggests finding someone with these three qualities:
  1. Strong coaching: The last thing you want in any type of manager is a big ego because it can’t, nor should it, always be about them. You need someone who not only knows what to do, but can teach it to others and understand what happened — and why it happened — if a sale didn’t go through.
  2. Leadership: No one likes being told what to do. The best sales managers will ask their team questions to help them realize on their own what they should do. That way they’ll figure out the answer on their own, and when they do, it’s ingrained in their memory.
  3.  Accountability: Sales beckons a do-it-yourself mentality, but even though they’re on their own, they still need management. Your best sales manager will keep the rest of the team accountable for their activities and coach them through each step of the process to get them closer to the close.
When you find someone whose skills check out, whether they’re homegrown or an outsider, you’re not free from red flags just yet. In order for them to succeed, they need some support from you. You need to give them:
  1. Proper management training: This is especially the case if your new sales manager has never directly managed a team before.
  2. The right responsibilities: Your sales manager is not a marketer or an office manager. You promoted them to lead, not to be stuck behind grunt work. They’re there to create the your sales process; staff and train the department; set company sales goals and track progress; and finally, lead and motive the team to hit those goals.
  3. Freedom to manage their way: Sales managers are the epitome of a middle management role: They have people reporting to them, but ultimately will be reporting to you. Instead of you being involved in every decision, step back and let them lead. Giving someone the freedom to make mistakes will help them learn from their mistakes and correct them.
  4. Time to learn: One of the worst things that can happen to any manager is them becoming complacent.  They get stuck doing the wrong responsibilities, and they lose the designer to learn and better the department.  Sales managers need the time to effectively learn what happens between sales call and closed sale, and stay in touch with resources so they keep evolving.
While it’s important to look to other outlets to find the best person for the best job, don’t immediately rule out your best sales person because they may have all of the qualities mentioned above. And if they do, your job just got much easier.

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

http://www.problogger.net/archives/2012/07/12/how-i-got-1000-people-to-my-blog-in-its-first-ten-days/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ProbloggerHelpingBloggersEarnMoney+%28ProBlogger%3A+Helping+Bloggers+Earn+Money%29


When I launched my first blog, the B2B Guide to Social Media, in 2010, my strategy for building its readership relied heavily on blind faith.
I must admit, it was difficult to maintain my enthusiasm for researching and drafting interesting blog posts, day after day, while I watched my Google Analytics figures hover in the single digits, and the only consistent Facebook likes I got were from my mum.
However, I pressed on, slowly gaining traction, and eventually building a solid monthly readership of 5,000 and a close-knit community of great guest bloggers. It was a slow process, but provided an excellent opportunity to learn what it takes to build a blog’s followers.
Fast-forward almost two years: I’ve been able to apply all this learning to help my latest blog, The B2B PR Blog, gain over 1,000 readers in its first ten days. Here’s how I did it.
  1. I chose my subject carefully: there are two elements of the new blog that have helped it appeal to followers. Firstly, it covers a niche (B2B PR rather than PR in general). Secondly, its core topic has not been covered in detail elsewhere on the web.
  2. I used a web designer: my blog is targeted at professionals, and therefore needed to look professional. I was not able to create a blog of this standard myself, so I brought on a designer who could (and I was fortunate enough to be able to pay him).
  3. I wrote my first ten posts before launching: I run a communications business and can never be sure when I will be able to find the time to blog. But I wanted to demonstrate to readers that the blog would be regularly updated with quality content. So I stockpiled my first ten posts, ready to upload daily for ten days.
  4. I asked a professional to do the on-site optimisation: I knew that if I were to rely on Google to drive searchers to my blog, I would have to make my site Google-friendly. Unfortunately, I am no technical expert in this area, so I got a professional to do it for me.
  5. I did keyword research: Using the Google Keyword Tool, I was able to identify what people in the industry were searching for, and insert these terms and phrases into my posts. The result was that in the first ten days, 108 people found my blog on Google.
  6. I used my social networks: I made a point of tweeting every post and sharing it on Facebook. I also joined the relevant LinkedIn groups and posted a link to every post with a relevant question on at least three discussion boards. This alone led to 561 visits in ten days.
  7. I used my contacts: On the day the blog launched, I sent an email to my friends, business associates, and family, telling them about the new blog and asking them for honest feedback.
  8. I added the link to the blog to the website of my PR company and email signature: to give more people the opportunity to find it. This drove 32 visitors to the blog in ten days.
  9. I commented on other blogs and articles: I found people who were writing about similar subjects and commented with a link back to my blog. This got an additional 46 visitors.
  10. I used social sharing: Between digg and StumbleUpon, the blog got over 26 visitors in ten days.
  11. I started guest blogging: I created a list of blogs covering similar areas of interest to mine (such as the CIPR or the PRCA’s blog) and pitched them with ideas for posts. Because I was offering unique content that I had researched and tailored to their audiences, these were accepted, and I was able to insert links to my blog into these posts. My first three guest posts referred 28 visitors to the blog.
  12. I kept the content unique, valuable, and relevant: because I had chosen to blog about a subject I knew well, I was able to identify the gaps in content on the web, and try to fill them. For example, while many B2B PR programs require research, no one had ever before produced a price comparison table for the major research houses. I knew that would be useful to the industry (because I had needed it myself at one stage), so I put the time into producing one (you can check it out here).
  13. I was happy to be controversial: Without being downright mean, I decided to highlight examples of poor B2B PR practice in my Steaming barrel, a section dedicated to the worst of B2B PR. While I would never be deliberately nasty about someone, I feel strongly that our industry gets away with too much. I therefore decided to be the one to put my head above the parapet and highlight shoddy practice.
  14. I remembered my manners: When someone did share my posts on Twitter or LinkedIn, I made a point of thanking them. And when people got in touch with ideas for guest posts, I responded even if they weren’t relevant.
  15. I monitored my analytics: Every morning I would log on to my Google Analytics account to see what was working and what was not. Then I would tailor my blog promotion activity for that day accordingly.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Why Are Food Prices So High?

http://www.forbes.com/sites/steveodland/2012/03/15/why-are-food-prices-so-high/


Food prices have skyrocketed over the past couple years.  While overall U.S. food prices rose about 5% last year, earlier in the year food inflation was the highest recorded in 36 years.  The USDA sees food prices rising 2.5%-3.5% in 2012 but many believe that inflation could be much higher.  This is concerning since the economy is not rocketing and interest rates are near zero.  Why are food prices so high?
Historically, food was a local issue as supply chains were short.  Food supply and demand were largely functions of local crop conditions impacted by weather, growing conditions, pests, etc.  Over the past century, supply chains and preservation have improved so that the food trade has become international.  Commodities, crops, and finished goods are traded globally.  This trade has stabilized prices when local weather or growing conditions are impacted.  But rising populations, largely in Asia, have created demand for crops and finished good from other parts of the world, and have impacted prices.
As every student of economics knows, price is a function of supply and demand.  When demand for a commodity rises on constant supply, prices usually rise.  Conversely, when demand falls at constant supply, prices usually fall.  The same thing works with supply.  Rising supply on constant demand causes a fall in prices while falling supply on constant demand causes prices to increase.  So one could conclude that rising food prices have been caused by falling supply or increased demand.  This is true, but there is a lot going on behind the scenes causing this.
What’s going on?
1)    China and India have the largest and fastest growing populations creating demand for food from around the world.  So one impact on prices has been rising demand from these countries, especially China.
2)    The Japanese tsunami and earthquake last year drove up seafood pricesby nearly 6%.
3)    Vegetable prices rose 50% in the past month.  Crop damage in Australia, Russia, and South America are to blame.
4)    Government subsidized and mandated ethanol use has increased the demand for corn and reduced acreage dedicated to food thereby pushing food prices up.  A Congressional Budget Office reportconcluded that the increased use of ethanol accounts for 10-15% of the increase in food prices.
5)    Changes in government subsidies for crops other than corn for ethanol impact food prices.
6)    Regulations restricting use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers, etc., while positive on some fronts, may result in poorer crop yields.
7)    Increased oil prices drive up costs for transportation, fertilizer, plastic packaging and inks used to print packaging.
8)    In some areas of the U.S., the government is paying farmers not to plant to save water.  This reduces food supply.
9)    Drier and hotter weather trends in farming areas generally reduce crop yield and drive prices higher.
10) Import tariffs and export taxes distort supply and demand, and hence food prices around the world.
The interaction of different commodity prices also is interesting.  For instance, the demand for corn and soybeans in China has pushed up the prices of eggs here in the U.S.  The grain costs account for about half of the 23% rise in egg prices last year.  The balance of the cost increase is due to fewer laying hens.  The rising costs of grain for feedstock have increased prices on beef and pork.  Advanced Economic Solutions, an economic research firm has predicted that beef prices will rise 12% in 2012.
Food manufacturers are doing everything they can to cut costs and avoid price increases.  These aggravate retailers who bear the cost of changing the pricing throughout their system and negatively affect consumer volume.  As a result, many manufacturers who held off on increases have needed to take larger increases than normal to catch up resulting in sticker shock.  For example,Kraft Foods raised prices 7.6% worldwide in the last quarter of 2011.
Some people think that rising food prices are a good sign because historically this has meant the economy is recovering.  But that isn’t necessarily true anymore.  Rising prices in the U.S. are
less driven by the economy here and more driven by the economic recovery and growth elsewhere.  The result is a slowly recovering economy in the U.S. but higher inflation than usual.  This, in turn, could require the Federal Reserve to take action to stem rising inflation by raising interest rates, and that could stagnate economic growth.  This kind of situation with low economic growth, high unemployment, and rising prices is called “stagflation” and was last seen here in the late 1970s.
Impacts from weather and natural disasters will ebb and flow over time and population growth will continue.  But policy changes like ending ethanol subsidies, eliminating or moderating other crop subsidies, moderating regulation on herbicide use, eliminating food tariffs/taxes, allowing more water use for agriculture, etc. all could help lower food costs.  Finally, actions to lower oil prices could help food inflation.
It seems likely that, given all these factors, food price inflation will continue in 2012.  This, on top of rising gas price, will hurt the American consumer and may play a role in the upcoming election.



Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Payer son parking avec un SMS : c'est possible !

http://www.itrmobiles.com/index.php/articles/130560/payer-son-parking-sms-est-possible.html

L’Association Française du Multimédia Mobile, Bouygues Télécom, Orange France et SFR annoncent le lancement d’un pilote de « M-Parking » pour une durée d’un an à Mulhouse. Inédit en France, mais déjà déployé avec succès dans plusieurs villes européennes, le paiement de places de parking par SMS présente l'avantage de faciliter la vie quotidienne des usagers automobilistes et d’augmenter le nombre de places payées au bénéfice des villes. D’autres déploiements devraient suivre en France.

Désormais, pour stationner sur la voie publique, plus besoin de monnaie, de carte de stationnement ou de carte bancaire. Plus besoin non plus de créer et d’approvisionner un compte à l’avance: l’automobiliste n’a plus qu’à envoyer un SMS, sans coût supplémentaire, pour être débité du montant du stationnement sur sa facture mobile.

Selon une étude menée fin 2011 par l’AFMM, payer le stationnement dans la rue grâce à son téléphone mobile suscite l’intérêt de 76% des possesseurs de mobile. Pas étonnant compte-tenu du fait que que 53% des équipés mobile en France ont déjà négligé le paiement de leur stationnement car ils ne possédaient pas le moyen de paiement adapté sur eux. Par ailleurs, 74% d’entre eux trouvent utile de recevoir quelques minutes avant la fin du stationnement une alerte par SMS. Ces données soulignent le potentiel d’une telle solution accessible à tous, simple et sûre.

Du côté des collectivités, cette solution est l'une des réponses à un problème majeur : le taux de stationnement payant non acquitté. C’est ce qu’ont pu vérifier plusieurs municipalités en Europe : de l'Allemagne (40 villes), à l'Autriche (8 villes), en passant par la Bulgarie (Sofia) ou la Serbie (21 villes) - qui ont connu suite à la mise en place d’une solution similaire une augmentation de leurs recettes.

Depuis le 15 mars, les Mulhousiens, clients des opérateurs Bouygues Telecom, Orange et SFR, peuvent payer leur stationnement sur la zone orange (2 400 places) en étant débités sur leur facture mobile.
Concrètement, une fois stationné, l’automobiliste envoie simplement par SMS au numéro court indiqué sur l’horodateur, le numéro de sa plaque d’immatriculation et choisit la durée de son stationnement. A la fin de sa période de stationnement, il est averti par SMS pour la prolonger, s’il le souhaite. L’utilisateur est ensuite directement débité sur sa facture opérateur. Dès la seconde utilisation du service, l’usager envoie simplement la lettre « P » pour parking au numéro court pour régler sa place.

D’autres villes lanceront leur service de paiement de places de parking par SMS en 2012, également dans une perspective d’expérimentation.

Monday, November 5, 2012

The Dirty Truth: Some Biofuels are More Polluting than Fossil Fuels

http://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Biofuels/The-Dirty-Truth-Some-Biofuels-are-More-Polluting-than-Fossil-Fuels.html


Biofuels are a clean, alternative energy that many are hoping will become the next source of liquid fuels for internal combustion engines; a clean substitute for polluting fossil fuels. The US is a huge supporter of biofuels, last year producing 1 billion gallons, and the EU has also stated its intentions for 10% of all transport fuel to be biofuel by 2020.
Wait a minute though, new data obtained from a leak by the European Commission provides evidence that not all biofuels are clean. In fact some are more polluting than fossil fuels.
The EU proposed a default value of 107g CO2 equivalent per megajoule of fuel (CO2/mj) for oil from tar sands, as compared to 87.5g CO2/mj for crude oil. Following is a list of the equivalent values for biofuels:
• Palm Oil - 105g
• Soybean – 103g
• Rapeseed – 95g
• Sunflower – 86g

• Palm Oil with methane capture – 83g
• Wheat (process fuel not specified) – 64g
• Wheat (as process fuel natural gas used in CHP) – 47g
• Corn (Maize) – 43g
• Sugar Cane – 36g
• Sugar Beet – 34g
• Wheat (straw as process fuel in CHP plants) – 35g
• 2G Ethanol (land-using) – 32g
• 2G Biodiesel (land-using) – 21g
• 2G Ethanol (non-land using) – 9g
• 2G Biodiesel (non-land using) – 9g
It is obvious that for a biofuel to be useful in cutting the emissions driving global warming it needs to have a smaller carbon footprint than regular fuel from crude oil. However calculating the carbon emissions of a biofuel must also include the natural forests and wetlands that are destroyed in the construction of plantations to grow the crops. Taking this into account it is immediately clear that palm oil and soy beans are unsupportable as sources of biofuel. Wheat, maize and sugar do little better than crude oil and are therefore not likely to solve our climate issues either. Second generation (2G), non-land using fuels are obviously the best. These include the waste-to-energy fuel sources, a sector that is steadily growing as more and more plants are constructed.
Robbie Blake, biofuels campaigner, at Friends of the Earth Europe, said, "It's getting quite indisputable that the use of soy or palm oil to fuel our cars is even dirtier than conventional fossil fuels. Forests in Asia and South America are being destroyed by the expansion of plantations to meet the European market. It's a delusion for politicians to think that biodiesel will solve climate change."
Biofuels remain vital to tackling climate change, but the difficulty now exists in identifying what constitutes a good biofuel. These figures help us to immediately recognise the best and worse, but they don’t give us any idea as to the cost of production. It is all well and good saying we should use 2G non-land using biofuels, but would we be willing to pay the higher price at the pumps? Perhaps the answer will be in the development of biofuels from algae and seaweed.

Saturday, November 3, 2012

A Super Detailed Graphic Laying Out All The Biggest Tech Acquirers

http://www.businessinsider.com/luma-partners-strategic-buyers-2012-9


Here's the latest chart from investment bankers Luma Partners. This one details the biggest strategic buyers in the digital world. Click on it to see a larger version. Below the chart is a full explanation of what you see here.
The chart is designed to show all the companies in the digital media world that are potential acquirers.
The closer a company is to the center circle, the more likely the company is to be a buyer. This is based on past activity. 
As for the colors, Luma says, "The coloration indicates a buyer’s capacity to make sizable acquisitions based roughly on trading multiples. Green is higher than yellow which is higher than red."


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/luma-partners-strategic-buyers-2012-9#ixzz2BAxJNd3m